Pages

Saturday, November 6, 2010

The Power of Interactivity



Hello again everyone and welcome back to my blog on media convergence. This week we are wrapping up both Briggs’ Journalism Next and Grant and Meadows’ Communication Technology Update and Fundamentals. Today’s topic, you ask? We’ll be talking about the interactive audience in both journalism and advertising.



With so much news content going online today, audience participation was inevitable. Now, instead of hindering this participation, news writers have begun to encourage this interactive behavior. Using interactive media in journalism allows a news writer to receive feedback on his work, spread his message to a broader audience through online word-of-mouth, obtain additional information from audience members that supplement the story, and gain valuable insights into what his audience wants to hear about in future stories. Online advertising and promotional materials have been affected in this same, positive manner. However, I believe that advertising was much more open to this new form of audience interaction because advertising depends so much on the opinion of the audience. Interactive media is just one more way in which the internet has benefited the advertising industry.

As many of you know, journalism and advertising have both fundamental similarities and also differences. One issue that applies to both industries when it comes to interactive media is the problem of getting the audience to participate when you want them to. What is amazing to me is the fact that so much of the web’s content is generated by so little of the online population. For example, a 2007 study found that over 50% of the edits on Wikipedia are done by less than 1% of the users. The key to getting the audience to participate in journalism is for the journalist to get involved. They need to interact with their audience in the same way they want the audience to interact with them. The same goes for advertisers. In order for the audience of an interactive online promotional campaign to participate, they must get something in return, even if that something is as small as an acknowledgement of participation.

One thing that applies more to journalism than to advertising is the issue of staying objective. When journalists publish content online, they can be tempted to editorialize and opinionate their stories. They have to remember that their online content is still news, and therefore, must remain objective. As Briggs points out, a journalist should never publish anything online that they would not publish in the New York Times. This is much less of an issue with advertising because, well, advertising is about the least objective form of mass communication out there. The whole point of advertising is to persuade an audience that the product or service is the best, even if it is not.

That is all I have for this week. Be sure to stop back tomorrow for the second episode of the Chris Wagner Blog Show, where you can learn even more about the fascinating material covered in this blog post. See you next time!

4 comments:

  1. yea i agree with you when you say that both advertising and journalism have similarities but also have differences. Interesting to think about. also thinking about how it really would be a problem getting the audience to participate when you want them too. but your right journalists really do need to get involved and they will get their results they want and need to be successful. its interesting to think about how now news is online and can be completely objective and people can comment and start a discussion about current events. interesting to think about. nice blog, really enjoyed reading it

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is hard to get an audience to participate at times with interacting on the Internet, but I think that is where advertising is doing a great job! Such as Facebook links your keywords of your interests from in your profile to simliar advertisements that might be of interest to you. I know a couple of ads that have caught my attention and I have clicked on them. Although it is always to find people to interact with if they dont get any incentives to go along with their participation, and people today are afraid to give out their information online, even if in return you get something free. I think the Internet and marketers need to do a better job of instantly giving their consumers something for their online participation whether it be a coupon, or a free future purchase. It might get more possible comsumers involved.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like your attention to advertisers as well as journalists. But like you mentioned, it is very important for both groups to interact with their audience if they expect the same thing in return.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I stumbled upon this blog and I must say it is very informative and interesting! Looking forward to learning more from you!

    ReplyDelete